Safety and Panic at Grenfell and FukushimaLessons for Radiation Safety Regulation in the UK post Euratom

by Mark Miller | Jul 27, 2017 | Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, LNT Hypothesis, Radiophobia

Safety and Panic at Grenfell and FukushimaLessons for Radiation Safety Regulation in the UK post...

A Failed Ontology: The Linear No-threshold Model of Radiogenic Cancer

by Mark Miller | Jul 26, 2017 | Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis, Nuclear Medicine, Nuclear Power

LNT’s Failed Ontology-June-2017  

Critical Thinking Table

by Mark Miller | Jul 23, 2017 | Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis, Radiophobia

Threshold model of radiogenic cancer

by Mark Miller | Jul 21, 2017 | Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis, Nuclear Medicine

NEI-2017Jul18_A failed ontology_LNT model of radiogenic cancer The linear no-threshold model of radiogenic cancer is false. Because it fails empirically against superior empiricism, it becomes misinformation and opinion, not knowledge, but it is still advocated...

Radiation hormesis: the link to nanomolar hydrogen peroxide

by Mark Miller | Jul 18, 2017 | Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis

dc-low-dose-Sies-Fei-signaling-paper-published-17fSies-Feinendegen-2017_Rad hormesis link to nanomolecular H2O2...

Preserving the Anti-Scientific LinearNo-Threshold Myth: Authority, Agnosticism,Transparency, and the Standard of Care

by Mark Miller | Jul 14, 2017 | Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis, Radiophobia

Sacks Siegel Preserving LNT final The linear no-threshold (LNT) assumption is over 70 years old and holds that all ionizing radiation exposure leaves cumulative effects, all of which are harmful regardless of how low the dose or dose rate...