by admin | Aug 25, 2022 | Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis
Cuttler-2022Aug2_Letter-to-McNutt_Restoring-scientific-ethics-to-NASDownload
by admin | Aug 25, 2022 | LNT Hypothesis
Research Article Summary The article critically examines whether the linear no-threshold (LNT) dose-response model is inconsistent with principles of evolutionary biology, suggesting that LNT’s assumption of cumulative harm at arbitrarily low doses may contradict how...
by admin | Aug 25, 2022 | LNT Hypothesis
Research Article Summary The article explores how evolutionary biology principles can inform and potentially reshape dose–response models used in risk assessment, arguing that many standard approaches (such as linear no-threshold) do not align with how biological...
by admin | Jul 18, 2022 | Featured Articles, LNT Hypothesis
10 Key Points In 1956, the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) released the BEAR I Genetics Panel Report on radiation risks. Newly discovered letters reveal the public report was written by third-party authors from Scientific American without panel approval. The...
by admin | Jun 30, 2022 | Featured Articles, LNT Hypothesis
Dr. Cardarelli, We, the undersigned members of Scientists for Accurate Radiation Information (SARI) and the XLNT Foundation would like to commend your initiative in putting together the outstanding 22-Episode Series exposing the History of the Linear No-Threshold...
by admin | May 26, 2022 | Featured Articles, LNT Hypothesis
10 Key Points LNT model advanced through ethically questionable actions and Science’s editorial practices Muller’s 1927 Science paper claimed gene mutation without data, bypassed peer review, was later shown to be flawed Stadler and others produced stronger,...
