RadiationEffects.org@Gmail.com
  • Facebook
  • Facebook
Radiation Effects
  • Home
  • Charter & Mission
  • Members
  • Join S.A.R.I
  • Useful Links
  • Educational Videos
Select Page
A-BOMBS, BEARS AND CORRUPTED SCIENCE  –  Reassessing radiation safety

A-BOMBS, BEARS AND CORRUPTED SCIENCE – Reassessing radiation safety

by admin | Jun 26, 2020 | Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis, Radiophobia

Research Article Summary • Challenging the LNT assumption: Calabrese argues that the linear no-threshold (LNT) model—which assumes any amount of ionizing radiation increases cancer risk proportionally—is historically rooted in early policy choices rather than solid...
Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector

Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector

by admin | May 4, 2020 | Featured Articles, LNT Hypothesis, Nuclear Medicine, Radiophobia

Research Article Summary • Critique of ALARA: The article argues that the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle — which aims to minimize radiation doses in medicine to the lowest possible level — has become counterproductive when applied without regard to...
Low-dose ionizing radiation and cancer risk: not so easy to tell – Suraj Dahal, Matthew J. Budoff

Low-dose ionizing radiation and cancer risk: not so easy to tell – Suraj Dahal, Matthew J. Budoff

by admin | Jan 19, 2020 | Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis, Nuclear Medicine

Research Article Summary • Central question: The article explores how challenging it is to accurately assess cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation, especially when relying on epidemiological data that may not be sensitive enough to detect subtle effects. •...
Stabin’s Comment on ‘the role of radiation protection professionals in the landscape of low dose radiation’

Stabin’s Comment on ‘the role of radiation protection professionals in the landscape of low dose radiation’

by admin | Dec 17, 2019 | Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis, Radiophobia

Research Article Summary • Context: The article discusses the evolving role of radiation protection professionals in a landscape where scientific uncertainties about low-dose ionizing radiation persist and public understanding is often limited or confused. This...
Bill Sacks’ and Jeff Siegel’s Response to Ansari’s “Reply to ‘the essential role of all scientists: critical evaluation not uncritical acceptance’”

Bill Sacks’ and Jeff Siegel’s Response to Ansari’s “Reply to ‘the essential role of all scientists: critical evaluation not uncritical acceptance’”

by admin | Dec 16, 2019 | Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis

Surrebuttal to Ansari response – December 2019Surrebuttal to Ansari response – December 2019 For your interest, attached is our penned surrebuttal to both Dr. Ansari’s reply to our letter to the editor of the Journal of Radiological Protection, and to the...
Assessing the Scientific Basis of the Linear No Threshold (LNT) Model

Assessing the Scientific Basis of the Linear No Threshold (LNT) Model

by admin | Dec 10, 2019 | LNT Hypothesis

Research Article Summary • Core question addressed:This article examines why determining cancer risk from low-dose ionizing radiation is far more complex and uncertain than commonly portrayed, particularly when conclusions rely heavily on epidemiological studies of...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Pages

  • Home
  • Charter & Mission
  • Members
  • Join S.A.R.I
  • Useful Links
  • Educational Videos
  • Nuclear Energy
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Science and Industry
  • Technical Library
  • Facebook