by admin | Nov 3, 2025 | LNT Hypothesis
https://jackdevanney.substack.com/p/faustian-bargain-or-near-perfect?r=30rj4o&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true Major error about Rockwell’s position on LNT corrected. See penultimate paragraph. Thanks to Rod Adams. “I take it that there are two main...
by admin | Oct 3, 2025 | LNT Hypothesis
Research Article Summary The research article evaluates the scientific basis for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s continued use of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model to estimate cancer risk from low-dose, low-dose-rate ionizing radiation exposures. The...
by admin | Sep 28, 2025 | LNT Hypothesis
10 Key Points By the 1920s, peer review was already a normal part of publishing in biology and medicine journals. Most big journals had editorial boards and outside reviewers deciding which studies got accepted. Rejection rates varied, but many papers were turned away...
by admin | Aug 14, 2025 | LNT Hypothesis
Research Article Summary The article investigates whether targeted infographics about low-dose radiation (LDR) can influence public understanding of LDR and support for small modular reactors (SMRs) in Canada. Two types of infographics were developed and tested: one...
by admin | Aug 7, 2025 | LNT Hypothesis
Research Article Summary The research article examines the historical influence of Hermann J. Muller on the development of secondary school biology curricula in the United States during the mid-20th century. It describes how federal funding and leadership by the...
by admin | Jul 12, 2025 | LNT Hypothesis
The linear no-threshold model of radiogenic cancer is false. Because it fails empirically against superior empiricism, it becomes misinformation and opinion, not knowledge, but it is still advocated because it lends contentment to believers.We can no longer tolerate...