by Mark Miller | Jul 18, 2019 | LNT Hypothesis, Radiophobia
http://The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations Highlights • The LNT model was based on a series of newly discovered scientific errors. • The LNT was adopted due to ideological...
by Mark Miller | Jul 18, 2019 | Featured Articles, LNT Hypothesis, Nuclear Medicine
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009279718310858?dgcid=raven_sd_recommender_email Highlights • LDR activates cellular defense systems which prevents propagation of damaged cells. • LDR activates long-term adaptive responses that protect cells from...
by Mark Miller | Jul 8, 2019 | LNT Hypothesis
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009279719308634?via%3Dihub Abstract The linear non-threshold (LNT) dose response model for cancer risk assessment has been a controversial concept since its initial proposal during the 1930s. It was long advocated by...
by Mark Miller | Jul 8, 2019 | LNT Hypothesis
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935119303251?via%3Dihub This paper evaluates the significant historical paper of Muller and Mott-Smith (1930), which successfully disputed the proposal of Olson and Lewis (1928) that background ionizing radiation...
by Mark Miller | Jun 28, 2019 | Featured Articles, LNT Hypothesis
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/chemico-biological-interactions/vol/301/suppl/C If LNT were a biologically valid dose-response model, the appearance and evolution of life on Earth would not have been possible. This link contains a wide spectrum of papers...
by Mark Miller | Jun 24, 2019 | LNT Hypothesis
dc-low-dose-Pollycove-Feinendegen-CR-Acad-Paris-99 Metabolic DNA damage/Radiation DNA damage = ~ 107 . Low-Dose Radiation adds NOTHING to background cancer rates…says his paper published 20 years ago! The message hasn’t changed. The effect of 1 mGy/year...