by Mark Miller | Jul 8, 2019 | LNT Hypothesis
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009279719308634?via%3Dihub Abstract The linear non-threshold (LNT) dose response model for cancer risk assessment has been a controversial concept since its initial proposal during the 1930s. It was long advocated by...
by Mark Miller | Jul 8, 2019 | LNT Hypothesis
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935119303251?via%3Dihub This paper evaluates the significant historical paper of Muller and Mott-Smith (1930), which successfully disputed the proposal of Olson and Lewis (1928) that background ionizing radiation...
by Mark Miller | Jun 28, 2019 | Featured Articles, LNT Hypothesis
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/chemico-biological-interactions/vol/301/suppl/C If LNT were a biologically valid dose-response model, the appearance and evolution of life on Earth would not have been possible. This link contains a wide spectrum of papers...
by Mark Miller | Jun 24, 2019 | LNT Hypothesis
dc-low-dose-Pollycove-Feinendegen-CR-Acad-Paris-99 Metabolic DNA damage/Radiation DNA damage = ~ 107 . Low-Dose Radiation adds NOTHING to background cancer rates…says his paper published 20 years ago! The message hasn’t changed. The effect of 1 mGy/year...
by Mark Miller | Jun 11, 2019 | Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, Featured Articles, LNT Hypothesis
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1559325819853669 Abstract Scientists are human. As such, they are prone to bias based on political and economic interests. While conflicts of interest are usually associated with private funding, research funded by public...
by Mark Miller | May 22, 2019 | Hormesis, LNT Hypothesis
https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Fulltext/2019/06000/Linear_No_threshold__LNT__vs__Hormesis__Paradigms,.7.aspx The linear no-threshold assumption misunderstands the complex multiphasic biological response to ionizing radiation, focusing solely on the initial...